Boundaries exist because people interact. These interactions become embedded in material culture, and from production until discard, people use objects to create, reinforce, and dispute socio-cultural boundaries. This volume seeks to challenge and transform how archaeologists define socio-cultural boundaries by reconstructing interactions through the assessment of various materials using an array of analytical techniques. During the Late Neolithic (5000–4500 BC), the communities of two major archaeological cultures, the Tisza and the Herpály, occupied the Great Hungarian Plain. These groups, traditionally defined based on the presence and absence of certain material traits, have long been reified in the archaeological literature. This study illustrates that group affiliation cannot solely be defined by material traits but rather by the degree of connectivity between sites. Based on the analyses conducted on archaeological materials from 12 Late Neolithic sites across the Great Hungarian Plain, an actively enforced socio-cultural boundary can be modeled between the Tisza and Herpály archaeological cultures. This research has far reaching implications for how archaeologists can view interactions as a way to measure, reconstruct, and model socio-cultural boundaries throughout time and space.
List of Figures
List of Tables
Preface and Acknowledgments
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Cultures and Boundaries
Chapter 3: Geographical and Environmental Settings
Chapter 4: Archaeological Background
Chapter 5: Research Design and Methodology
Chapter 6: The Sites and the Assemblages
Chapter 7: Results of Geochemical Analyses
Chapter 8: Ceramic Style, Chipped Stone Assessment, and Networks
Chapter 9: Patterns of Interactions on the Great Hungarian Plain
Chapter 10: Conclusions
Bibliography; Appendix A: Ceramic samples analyzed with LA-ICP-MS
Appendix B: LA-ICP-MS results for ceramic samples
Appendix C: Locational data for clay samples
Appendix D: LA-ICP-MS results for clay samples
Appendix E: Geological obsidian samples analyzed
Appendix F: P-XRF results for geological obsidian samples from the Lithotheca collection
Appendix G: P-XRF results for archaeological obsidian samples
Appendix H: Membership probabilities for the five identified ceramic compositional groups
Appendix I: Ceramics by the three identified regional ceramic compositional groups
Appendix J: Chipped stone assemblages analyzed and the results of the provenience and technological analyses